Showing posts with label andreas-rares. Show all posts
Showing posts with label andreas-rares. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

My Little Fish in the Forest



Sometimes children come and ask me what is wrong with Andreas-Rares. How come he is not running and playing with the other kids. I thought long and hard of what the answer to that question should be. Children understand things that sometimes even adults struggle with. But what I have noticed is that children feel more than they understand and sometimes, what they understand is filtered through their feelings.

If there is one thing I learned during the last years is that exclusion starts from home. Society comes to strongly reinforce what people have already led their children to believe. Most parents don’t even realize they are doing it because it has to do with their feeling of “normality” which, they expect to be accepted as a given. 


In my opinion, social “normality” does not exist. 

The problem with this approach is that a parent would start from the premises that their actions and their children’s actions need to fit, embrace or otherwise obey the society rules. So they are raising their children to fit in. Which is not absurd but it defeats the purpose of parenting. 

I believe a parent’s purpose should be to nurture and shape the child’s world within. Help them learn how to express better their needs, how not to be scared of expressing their feeling no matter what society will label them as, how to solve their own problems without always looking for the easy way out, how to ask for help when they need to, in short, how to think independently.

The thing is that society changes its rules every generation. The rules that parents are familiar with from their childhood and they are trying to impose to their children are already obsolete.
Why is it important to give children a chance to shape their own society, with their own set of new rules? Because the old rules are broken, because for generations we keep hanging on to stereotype thinking that unless we let go, they won’t disappear. Things like: 

-          - Child screaming in the supermarket. Everyone gives killer looks to the mother – “Bad mother” look; “Make him stop” look; “You are bothering me” look and so on. Succumbing under social pressure the mother turns to the child and threatens him.
-           - Special needs child has a repetitive spastic movement in his wheel chair in the middle of a crowded mall. People either look at him like at a wounded animal that needs to be put down or turn their faces in disgust.
-          - Severely spastic child, wheelchair bound. His parents take him out for walks only after dark.
It takes strength to go against the “society rules” and when you have a special needs child, strength is something you don’t have to spare.

Here, as in many other countries, under the shiny glow of the special needs programs and activities there lies a very old and twisted believe that it’s a shame to have a special needs child. A special needs child is something to be hidden from the light of day, forgotten somewhere in a corner and never to be spoke of again.

You would think that this mentality is only reserved for the people in the villages, the ones who barely read or write, but you would be wrong. We even had a doctor telling us that it’s bad for his soul (the doctor’s) to have a patient who will never improve since he has a syndrome. It’s sad but very true unfortunately. 

Getting back to our story, I decided to explain to the kids that Andreas-Rares is like a fish in a forest. He’s is perfect as he is. He is neither “damaged” nor inferior in any way. He is just in the wrong place, like a fish in a forest.  Just because it’s harder to get to know his world it doesn’t mean that it’s less valuable or less meaningful.

Monday, September 12, 2016

Flight Experience with Ryanair



Remember those happy faces we’ve posted from the airport before leaving Bucharest? Well, forget about them. After that all hell broke loose.

We went to the boarding gate of our Ryanair flight. There were lots of people and a not so welcoming lady from the flight company who was commenting on what luggage people had. For example when we got in front her reaction that went with a sour face was “ah, look, a baby carriage”. As if she was suppose to carry the luggage herself to Athens.
Anyhow, she said there is no place on the plane for luggage and I cannot travel with it inside the aircraft so she took it. It’s not the first time they take the luggage because they have no space and they return it at the stairs of the plane, along with the carriage. So I wasn’t worried. 

I started getting though when I got off the airplane and only saw the carriage. I asked one of the handlers and he said they’ve sent them all to luggage claim area. We had another flight in an hour so time was short. I figured I could talk to them at the gate and they would put my luggage in this plane particularly since my luggage was a cabin luggage and it shouldn’t have ended up in the luggage claim area in the first place. I took Andreas-Rares and went to the other end of the airport where the gate of our next flight was. After queues, security checks, passport control I finally get to the gate and expressed my problem to one of the ladies there. 

She looked blank at me and she told me that there is nothing she can do. I should have taken my luggage and she kept insisting that Ryanair is a “point to point” company. By then I really started getting agitated. I’ve been on the road for 12h already and my nerves were not in the best of shape. With the last calm breath I had I asked her what exactly does “point to point mean” and she told me, with an increasingly risen voice, that I should have read the Terms and Conditions form the Ryanair site when I bought the tickets. That everything is clearly written there, Ryanair doesn’t deliver luggage to destination if you have more than one flight. You need to go pick it up and go to your next flight.  

“Ok, but that was my CABIN luggage that you people misplaced! What am I suppose to do now? “
“Talk to Ryan Air!”
“But YOU ARE Ryanair!” 

She continued yelling, telling me that I should have read the Terms and Conditions on the site, that it’s not their fault and that I should have brought my luggage with me.

Back to the real world, the choices I had were two and I didn't like any: either lose the plane and get the luggage or lose the luggage (with probably no chance of getting it back considering the level of professionalism I’ve encountered) and take the plane. 

I had Andreas-Rares medication from the medical trial in the luggage so choosing the plane was not really an option. 

At 10PM last night I was in the Athens airport, tired, with no other flight going to Thessaloniki that day, with a tired, hungry and already scared baby and with no one to turn to for help in the city. I broke down and cried. I just needed to let it out. Andreas-Rares looked at me and he started laughing. I must have been a very amusing site. Somehow that laugh got me back on my feet. 

I went and reclaimed the luggage, called my husband who found a buss leaving from to Thessaloniki in the next hour. Took a cab, went to the bus station and everything seemed to get back in track.

Everything was ok until we got into the buss and it started moving. Andreas-Rares has never been in a bus before. He traveled by car, plane, train but never by bus so the sounds the bus is making were totally unknown to him. He jumped up terrified 5 minutes after the bus had left and I couldn’t calm his screams for more than two hours. He was exhausted and so was I. He finally managed to fall asleep in my arms. That is the second time in his life he did that. The first one was when we ended up in the ER this summer with that bad case of vomiting. 

We got to Thessaloniki at 6AM after a total of 20 hours of travel. After this experience, one thing is for sure, Ryanair is not a flight company I want to fly again with.  

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

“Your Child Is Too Young to Walk”



Thessaloniki, 12th of April 2016. Today we were called to meet the official committee in order to evaluate Andreas-Rares’ special needs so that we may obtain some form of support from the state to help with his therapies because, at this moment, everything we do for him is exclusively on our money and the money from your donations.

The meeting with the committee lasted less than 5 minutes time in which none of the three members examined Andreas-Rares in any way. They asked if he is walking, the answer was obviously “no”; if he is sitting unassisted and again the answer was “no”. And then, without looking over the pile of documentation and medical papers that we provided and without asking any more details, they reached their their final assessment: 

“Your child is too young to walk. Come back in two years.“





We are definitely going to make an appeal. Unfortunately that is going to take time, time equals expenses so we can just say that we are running out of...time.

Even though I promised I will not allow myself to get dragged into that anger swirl that tormented me for months I think today is that special day for a major relapse!

Friday, April 1, 2016

Scratching the Surface on Clinical Trials



I decided to write this article because I feel the need of sharing what I’ve learned so far about clinical trials so that other patients who are in the position of taking part in a trial may know a bit more and may take better informed decisions.
I hope this article reaches those people who feel they are standing on the edge of a cliff making a life altering decision, having the sentiment of no one being on their side.

First things you should know about medical trials is that “it’s not about you”. The quicker you understand this, the easier it will be to adjust your expectations regarding the trial. We are used to create bonds with our doctors because we know their first priority is to treat us, their patients. In clinical trials the goal is to obtain new medical data, preferably the kind of data that can be generalized. Read this and understand it well. Don’t get into a medical trial having the wrong expectations. You already have enough on your plate as it is.
As a patient, you need to be informed about what will happen during the trial. You need to take an informed decision so ASK anything you are unsure of, anything you feel you might want to know. Before you start a medical trial you will need to give your Informed Consent. This is a document that should answer most of your questions and should be written in terms you can easily understand. My advice, take a piece of paper and write down all the questions that rise from that document so you can discuss  them to your doctor the next time you meet. 

Know that just because you gave your consent it doesn’t mean you are no longer allowed to ask questions or the doctor is not obliged to answer them. You can and should ask any question you consider relevant at any point in the trial. Some questions will rise during the trial so there would be no way for you to foresee them.
Trials are free. If a doctor asks you for money in order to join a trial, something is fishy either with the doctor or with the trial. You can verify the existence of the trial here: https://clinicaltrials.gov. If it’s not here it doesn’t exist.
If a doctor asks you to sign a paper assuming responsibility for whatever happens within the trial, know that, apart from the fact that it’s unethical, it’s also very much illegal so the paper is void. Even though you give your informed consent the researchers are still the ones who are responsible for your well being. There is also an ethical board you can denounce the doctor to.

There are some principles that every trial should abide. To know them means to know your rights and to be able to defend them.
Beneficence or non Maleficence – what it means is that a doctor should do well or, at least, do no harm. Translated into trial reality this means for example that if a treatment exists for a disease, the researchers are not allowed to give placebos in a trial for a new drug. They are bound by ethic rules to give patients from the control group the treatment that already exists.
Autonomy – This means that the free choice of the patient to participate or not in a trial needs to be respected no matter what. For the patient this means that he/she needs to be very well informed in order to: 1.  not lose the opportunity of participating in a trial that may change his/her life or 2. on the contrary, to participate for the wrong reasons/expectations.  There is a special chapter in this section dealing with coercion. The decision, which ever it would be, needs to be based only on arguments and information. Offers or insinuations of offers regarding money, better life conditions during the trial, psychological pressure or any kind of pressure for that matter should not exist.

Distributive justice – In clinical trials it refers to the fact that the constraints as well as the potential benefits that rise from the research should be fairly distributed among the participants in the trial.
For further reading click here

Ok, so you can ask ANYTHING but there are so many things you don’t know that you don’t even know where to start. Here is a list of questions you might want to start with.

 - What is being studied?
 - Why do researchers believe the intervention being tested might be effective? Why might it not be effective? Has it been tested before?
 - What are the possible interventions that I might receive during the trial?
 - How will it be determined which interventions I receive (for example, by chance)?
 - Who will know which intervention I receive during the trial? Will I know? Will members of the research team know?
  How do the possible risks, side effects, and benefits of this trial compare with those of my current treatment?
 - What will I have to do?
See the full list here.
Other information that the investigators may inform the participants about include:
- the trial’s place in the scientific study (Phase I, II, III)
- the endpoints of the study
- the anticipated benefits
- the scheme of the study (controlled/not controlled, blinding/not blinding/double blinding)
- potential risks.
One other thing that it’s important to know: When you ask a question be ready for the answer. Probably some answers won’t be pretty, like the ones related to potential side effects and risks. Make sure that you understand and weight them well in your decision. Researchers will not put you in harm’s way just for the fun of it. Human research is done only when there is no alternative. But risks do exist end you need to make sure you have assumed them when you are moving forward with a trial.
One last thing…The trial will be uncharted territory for you so don’t take anything for granted. Be sharp, be vigilant because in the end you are the only one representing your own interest in a medical trial.